Pimentel's blog

Return to Part 1:   On the irrationality of some "experts" (Part 1) Only two days after filing the criminal complaint in person at the corresponding court, I received the response, already back in my home country: it was dismissed, as it was considered that the matter reported did not fall under criminal law, but rather administrative law . The judicial resolution allowed for an appeal, so I requested—via telematics—a court-appointed defense from the Illustrious Bar Association of Barcelona ( ICAB ), since self-representation is not permitted in these matters in Spain. But how was I able to access a court-appointed defense if the applicable legislation explicitly states that I must be physically present in Spain to request it? Well, I suppose the ICAB finally applied common sense after having denied me defense in person up to three (3) times, and after I notified the Consulate of my country in Barcelona, which became my legal address for hearing and receiving notifications. F...

Finally, two years after the first rejection, my first paper was accepted until showing the results obtained by the corresponding unsteady vortex element ( "balls and sticks" ) method, based on the same original steady concepts. By the way, who is the lord of the cats ? And now, the most difficult reasoning test ever: 1. Viscosity is related to attached fluids as well as inviscidity is related to: a) Also, attached fluids 🙈 b) Neither attached nor detached but all the opposite 🤡 c) Detached flows 🙉 d) Only God knows 😇 "Learn what is to be taken seriously and laugh at the rest".  —Hermann Hesse